2025-06-24
No Duty To Doubt: An Analysis Of Philipp V Barclays Bank And Its Implications On The Banker-customer Relationship
Comment by Cynthia Amiri L. E.
Abstract
The paper explores a pivotal United Kingdom Supreme Court decision, Philipp v Barclays Bank that redefined the legal obligations of banks towards customers in the context of fraud. The Court held that banks do not owe a duty of care to challenge payment instructions made by customers, even when those instructions arise from fraudulent inducement. This ruling narrows the scope of the Quincecare duty, traditionally requiring banks to verify the authenticity of transactions under suspicion of fraud. The implications of this judgment are far-reaching, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly, as it shifts the onus of fraud prevention onto customers. The paper critically analyzes the judgment's impact on the banker-customer relationship and the broader financial landscape.