Domesticating The Kampala Convention As A Pivotal Step In Protecting Persons Displaced By Conflict And Violence In Northern Nigeria
Esther Hatsiwa Emmanuel
The paper interrogates the internal displacement in northern Nigeria, through an appraisal of the extant laws particularly the African Union Convention for the Protection and Assistance of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in Africa (Kampala Convention) and other International, regional and domestic instruments. There is no specific National legal framework for the protection and assistance of internally displaced persons in Nigeria. The state is yet to domesticate the Kampala Convention, even though there is a bill pending before the National Assembly that seeks to do the same. The paper recognizes that efforts have been invested by national authorities in developing a National IDP Policy, which was finalized in 2012 but was never adopted. Nigeria should therefore operationalize the Kampala Convention because it provides a comprehensive framework that will bring improvement to the lives of IDP’s in Northern Nigeria.
Long Walk To Justiciability: Article 8a And Uganda’s National Objectives And Directive Principles Of State Policy
Kansiime M. Taremwa and Lisandra Kabagenyi
The 1995 Constitution of the Republic of Uganda was lauded by many commentators
as one of the best in the region. Much of these sentiments of admiration gained
traction because of the comprehensive nature of the Bill of Rights in Chapter 4 of the
Constitution. However, the main body of Chapter 4 did not include a number of
economic, social and cultural rights and they were instead included as part of the
manifesto of aspirations code named, the “National Objectives and Directive
Principles of State Policy.” Judicial enforcement of ESCRs became difficult because of
the fact that these National Objectives were not considered justiciable. In 2005, the
Constitution was amended, introducing a new Article 8A in its main body that seemed
to suggest that NODSPs were not merely aspirations. Notwithstanding some victories,
the experience that the courts have had with Article 8A has left a lot to be desired.
Celebrating The Center For Health, Human Rights And Development (cehurd), A Ten Year Old Adult
J. Oloka Onyango
Ten years in the life of a human rights organization is nearly a lifetime, a fact
which is particularly true in the case of organizations in developing country
contexts such as Uganda. Consequently, the 10th anniversary celebration of the
Centre for Health, Human Rights and Development (CEHURD) should not be taken
for granted. This is especially true given its pioneering work in the rather neglected
area of promoting and protecting the right to health (RTH). At 10, CEHURD is a
paragon of the 3Vs: a Vibrant, Vivacious and Vigourous organization offering
scholars and practitioners numerous points of reflection on the efficacy of protecting
economic, social and cultural rights (ESCRs), against the backdrop of retreating
state obligations, the onslaught of neoliberal economic policies and dealing with a
judicial system only grudgingly accepting the justiciability of this often-neglected
category of human rights.
The Human Rights Implications Of Uganda's Borrowing
Ruth Muhawe
The relationship between the sovereign debt of developing countries and the protection of the social rights of citizens in those countries has received considerable analysis from the economic, political and moral perspectives, but relatively little has been written from the legal point of view. Consequently, this paper provides legal insights into the lingering crisis that sovereign debt poses to human rights, with a specific focus on the economy of Uganda. The paper is particularly concerned with examining what Uganda’s debt burden means for the basic observance and enjoyment of human rights by its citizens of both the present and the future.